Rhinoplasty for Nasal Deformity due to Birth Trauma: A Case Report
Arda Özdemir1*, Asc. Prof. Burak Sercan Erçin2
¹TC Siirt Research and Education Hospital, Siirt, Türkiye
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9959-7315
arda.ozd@hotmail.com
²Private Practice, İstanbul, Türkiye
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3817-7760
bsercin@gmail.com
*Corresponding author
*Arda Özdemir,TC Siirt Research and Education Hospital, Siirt, Türkiye
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9959-7315
arda.ozd@hotmail.com
DOI: 10.55920/JCRMHS.2025.09.001402
Figures 1 and 2: Preoperative appearance of the patient from the front and lateral profiles.
Open rhinoplasty technique was employed using transcolumellar and infracartilaginous incisions to elevate the nasal flap through SubSMAS and subperiosteal planes. Cartilage excision of appropriate length was performed from the caudal septum to decrease nasal length and increase rotation, and the septum was fixed to the anterior nasal spine to correct axis deviation. A graft was obtained while preserving a 1 cm safe L strut from the residual septum. The dorsal hump was excised, and cephalic resection was performed on the lower lateral cartilages. New dome points were identified and transdomal sutures were placed. The aim was to provide the patient with projection and rotation using a septal extension graft. A type 3 septal extension graft was prepared from the cartilage obtained from the septum, adapted to be parallel to the caudal septum. The new dome points and the septal extension graft were stitched together with interdomal sutures. The inferior turbinates were lateralized. Following the standard rhinoplasty steps, the operation was concluded with the placement of silicone packing and a thermoplastic splint. The patient's early postoperative appearance is shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3: Early postoperative appearance of the patient.
The patient was satisfied with both respiratory and aesthetic outcomes during follow-ups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Photographs taken during her visits showed no loss of projection or rotation in the long term postoperatively. The patient's appearance at 6 months postoperative is shown in Figures 4 and 5.
Figures 4 and 5: Postoperative 6-month appearance of the patient from the front and lateral profiles.