The Examination of Fetal Myocardium and Maternal and Fetal Features of Pregnancy Complicated by Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Zoltán Pál1, Zsófia Kádas1, Zoltán Kozinszky1,2*, Andrea Surányi 1*
¹Department of Obstetrics and Gynecolgy, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged,(Csongrád-Csanád), Hungary
²Capio Specialized Center for Gynecology, Solna, 171 45, Stockholm, Sweden
*These authors contributed equally
*Corresponding author
*Andrea Surányi, M.D., Ph.D, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecolgy, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged, Szeged,(Csongrád-Csanád), Hungary. Email: gaspar-suranyi.andrea@med.u-szeged.hu
DOI: 10.55920/JCRMHS.2024.07.001308
Table 1a: Maternal characteristics
Table 1b: Neonatal characteristics
Figure 2: Anteroposterior neck x-ray.
Figure 1: Measurement of intraventricular septum in four-chamber view using M-mode (24-28th gestational weeks). Control_Wong [14].
Figure 2: Measurement of intraventricular septum in four-chamber view using M-mode (32-38th gestational weeks). Control_Wong [14].
Simultaneously measuring average and standard deviation (0,65cm±0,25) of the left ventricle’s muscle’s thickness, we did not find significant discrepancy (p=0,053) compared to the average and standard deviation (0,26cm±0,07) of the our control group. We compared our control group with control group mentioned in the literature [14], there was no significantly alteration (p=0,067).
The interventricular septum’s average and standard deviation (0,76cm±0,29) examined in gestational weeks 32-38 significantly differs (p<0,001) from the average and standard deviation (0,36cm±0,07) of the our control goup and the control group (N=44) mentioned in the literature[14] ( see Figure 2). We compared our control group with control group mentioned in the literature[14], there was no significantly alteration (p=0,072).
Simultaneously measured average (0,99cm±0,53) of the left ventricle’s muscle’s thickness (N=14) shows significant discrepancy (p=0,001) compared to the average (0,42cm±0,12) of the control group (N=41) mentioned in the literature by Wong et al [14].
During the first ultrasound examinations (24-28th weeks), neither the quantity of the amniotic fluid, nor pathological flow of umbilical and uterinal arteries could be registered.
However, during the examinations in the 32-38th gestational weeks 11% of the GDM cases showed an increased amount of amniotic fluid and 16,67% showed pathological flow of uterinal artery.
Results/ Results regarding infants
The newborns characteristics data are in Table 1b. We realized higher frequency in caesarean section (85% vs normal 12%) and the female gender (63% vs normal 47%) in GDM cases.
Comparing the birth weights to the given gestational week, they fall into three categories: IUGR below 10 percentiles, macrosomia over 90 percentiles, between the two ranges the infant is of normal weight [15,16].
63% of them were born with normal weight, 21% were macrosomic infants and 16% were born with IUGR.
Based on their weight before pregnancy, out of first-degree obese pregnant women, 50% were diagnosed with GDM. 33% of ones with GDM gave birth in due time to normal-weight infants, while in cases (16%) of the pathological flow of uterinal artery was registered and gave birth as a premature infant needing transportation to neonatal intensive centre.
In summary, 75% of the newborns with IUGR had pathological Apgar-scores, while 25% of the macrosomic infants received a score of 7 in the first minute, but on the whole, their condition was stabilised after 5 and 10 minutes of the delivery.
The average value of their umbilical cord’s pH is 7,24±0,14.
15% of them had to be transported to NIC due to perinatal complications (meconium aspiration, acute intrauterine distress).




