An typical case of Acute Posterior Multifocal placoid pigment Epitheliopathy with intraretinal fluid

Renato Correia Barbosa*

Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Porto, Portugal

*Corresponding author

*Renato Correia Barbosa, Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy is a rare inflammatory chorioretinopathy, classified as a white dot syndrome. It usually presents in young adults and results in ischemia of the choriocapillaris leading to atrophy of the external retinal layers, including the retinal pigment epithelium. This report describes an atypical case of this disease with the presence of intraretinal fluid.

A 20-year-old male patient presented with complaints of sudden, severe left eye vision loss. He did not report any systemic symptoms, and his medical history was unremarkable. Slit-lamp examination and fundoscopy revealed a normal anterior segment, with yellow placoid lesions on his macula and near periphery. He underwent a spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography, which revealed the presence of central intraretinal fluid in his left eye and multiple areas of macular ischemia bilaterally. Treatment was started with oral corticosteroids, and the anatomical changes, including the intraretinal fluid, steadily improved over the following weeks.

Although rare, the presence of subretinal or intraretinal fluid should not decrease the suspicion of the diagnosis of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. The reabsorption of the fluid usually accompanies the improvement of the remaining anatomical changes and the visual function.

INTRODUCTION

Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE) is a rare inflammatory chorioretinopathy, first described by Gass in 19681. It is classified as a white dot syndrome and has an estimated incidence of 0.15 cases per 100,000 people2,3. The most common presentation is bilateral. It affects men and women equally, often during the 2nd to 4th decades. Its pathophysiology is not clearly understood, and the primarily affected region of the retina is unclear4,5. Initially, it was thought that the disease primarily involved inflammation in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)6,7, producing the characteristic placoid lesions. Other hypotheses consider ischemia in the choriocapillaris, due to occlusive vasculitis, potentially due to inflammatory or autoimmune processes, resulting in hypoperfusion of the RPE and photoreceptors8. The most accepted theory at present refers to a primary affectation of the choriocapillaris, leading to secondary injury of the RPE and outer retina, resulting in the atrophy of the choriocapillaris, RPE, and photoreceptors. Approximately 33% of the patients report preceding flu-like symptoms before APMPPE’s onset9. The disease has also been described as associated with cases of systemic vasculitis, sarcoidosis, ulcerative colitis, thyroiditis, other viral and bacterial infections, and post-vaccination10-12. Genetic associations have been reported involving the HLA-B7 and HLA-DR2 haplotypes13.

The diagnosis of APMPPE is established by the clinical presentation, retinoscopy findings, and complementary imaging tests, such as spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), fundus autofluorescence (FAF), fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA)3,5. The most common ophthalmological complaint is a bilateral, usually asymmetric, rapid onset of blurred vision associated with central or paracentral localized scotomas. Best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) may range from 6/10 to count-fingers, and photopsia and metamorphopsia may also develop. Systemic symptoms such as flu-like syndrome and headache may be present concomitantly. The anterior segment evaluation is usually normal, but anterior cell reaction may develop. Mild vitritis is reported in 50% of the cases. Fundus examination often shows white-yellow placoid lesions at the level of the RPE and choroid4. Papillitis may occur, but cystoid macular edema is uncommon. The most typical acute findings in SD-OCT include hyperreflectivity in the outer retinal layers and the absence of the ellipsoid zone14,15. FA usually exhibits early hypofluorescence corresponding to the placoid lesions, followed by late hyperfluorescent staining. The early hypofluorescence may represent poor perfusion of the choriocapillaris or blockage due to the overlying outer retina and RPE thickening16. IGCA manifests early and late hypofluorescence, due to the poor perfusion of the choriocapillaris.

The natural history of APMPEE is usually self-limited, with partial or complete resolution of the visual symptoms after 4-8 weeks. Most patients achieve a BCVA of 6/12 or better. Foveal involvement confers a worse prognosis5. Other factors which may also lead to a worse prognosis include patients older than 60 years, unilaterality, and an interval of 6 months before the involvement of the second eye17. There is no current consensus regarding the treatment and its impact on the final visual result. Steroids are anecdotally used when the macula is involved. The recurrence of the disease is uncommon and generally predicts a worse prognosis3. All patients with a new diagnosis of APMPEE should receive full neurologic and systemic workup to evaluate for CNS vasculitis and other associated systemic conditions such as autoimmune and infectious diseases.

The purpose of this work is to report a case of this disease with atypical imagiological presentation, diagnosed in a 20-year-old patient.

Case presentation

A 20-year-old male patient presented in the emergency department with complaints of severe left eye (OS) vision loss for 4 days. He did not report any other ocular symptoms, such as red eye or pain. He denied trauma or any other precipitating factors. His medical history was unremarkable, and he did not take any medication. There was no history of recent disease or flu-like symptoms. His BCVA was 6/6 and 6/30 on his right and left eyes, respectively. The slit-lamp examination showed a normal anterior segment, with the absence of anterior chamber reaction. Fundoscopy revealed macular yellowish placoid lesions, occupying a large portion of the macula and the near periphery. He underwent a SD-OCT and FA, which showed the presence of central intraretinal fluid dispersed in an atypical pattern, on the OS (Figure 1), and multiple areas of macular ischemia bilaterally, with late central and paracentral diffusion (figure 2). A systemic study with infectious and immunological markers was requested that came out negative. Neurological examination was also unremarkable. After ruling out an infectious cause, an initial dose of 80mg of prednisolone was started.

Three days after the initial presentation, the patient was reevaluated. His OS BCVA had improved to 6/12, the anterior chamber still had no inflammatory reaction, and the fundoscopy appearance was similar. The SD-OCT was repeated, which showed a reduced volume of intraretinal fluid (figure 3). Given the improvement of the clinical picture, treatment was maintained. He was again evaluated 1 week after onset, showing a similar BCVA of 6/12 on his OS, but this time the intraretinal fluid had completely disappeared on the SD-OCT. A progressive weaning of the oral corticosteroid was started, and his BCVA progressively improved during the following weeks. During the last observation, 8 weeks after the initial presentation, the patient had a BCVA of 6/7.5 on his OS. Fundoscopy revealed a marked improvement of the posterior pole lesions, with some regions of cicatricial pigmentary changes (figure 4). SD-OCTs repeated during each examination showed the absence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid, with mild anatomical changes in the outer layers of the retina (Figure 5).

Discussion

APMPPE is a rare inflammatory chorioretinopathy of unclear cause, which mainly affects young adults. Although its physiopathology is unclear, recent studies report that ischemia occurring in the choriocapillaris results in hypoperfusion of the RPE and photoreceptors and consequent atrophy of the outer retinal layers8. The case we described consisted of a 20-year-old male patient with initial complaints of sudden unilateral vision loss. Although the subjective complaints were unilateral, imaging studies showed a bilateral, asymmetrical involvement. It was therefore a case with bilateral structural anatomic changes, with unilateral functional manifestations, probably since the pathologic process was more severe on the OS, therefore having a greater functional impact. Those findings were similar to most described cases of APMPPE, where asymmetric bilateral changes are present6. Although many cases are preceded by systemic symptoms like flu-like syndrome9, our patient did not have any history of recent systemic disease. Headache or other neurologic manifestations were also not present. In all cases, a full neurological and systemic study must be performed to rule out the existence of complications, namely cerebral vasculitis, which is associated with this disease in some cases18,19. The initial OS BCVA of 6/30 matched the values described in the literature for this disease, which may range from 6/12 to count-fingers. Fundoscopy appearance, consisting of yellowish plaques involving the macula and the near periphery were also typical4. However, the presence of intraretinal fluid, as evidenced by Figure 1, constitutes a rare finding, scarcely reported throughout the literature. Birnbaum et al described a small series of cases including some with subretinal (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) shown in SD-OCT. They hypothesized that a mildly reflective layer forms above the RPE, likely representing inflammatory debris or degenerative material, giving the impression that the fluid is intraretinal, although it is subretinal. They also stated that the quick and substantial recovery of visual acuity supports the presence of SRF, rather than IRF20. Nonetheless, even though it is rare, SRF or apparent IRF is a possible finding in APMPPE, and should not decrease the suspicion of the diagnosis. The resolution of fluid usually accompanies the improvement of the visual function and is typically rapid.

Regarding the treatment, the evidence is unclear. Most studies report that structural and functional improvement is usually fast and occurs spontaneously, without any treatment3. However, many authors consider treatment with oral corticosteroids when the lesions affect the fovea17. When central nervous system vasculitis is present, therapy is mandatory and can be life-saving. A recurrent form of APMPPE may represent a different clinical entity called relentless placoid chorioretinitis, a disease that shares features with APMPPE and serpiginous choroidopathy. It has a high recurrence rate and longer periods of activity. In those cases, immunomodulatory therapy may be necessary21,22. In our case, the patient was promptly treated with oral corticosteroids as soon as an infectious cause was ruled out. The structural changes, namely the presence of intraretinal fluid improved rapidly, within 1 week, while the BCVA steadily, and almost completely improved during the 8 weeks following the onset of the disease. It was not possible to conclude whether the use of corticosteroids had an impact on the improvement of the anatomical and functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This report presented a case of APMPPE with atypical imagiological findings, namely the presence of intraretinal fluid. Despite being a rare, scarcely reported finding, in this disease, the presence of foveal subretinal or intraretinal fluid should not lessen the degree of suspicion of this disease. The reabsorption of the fluid is usually spontaneous and fast, accompanying the improvement of the visual function. There is insufficient evidence to conclude that active treatment with corticosteroids influences the rate of improvement of the intraretinal fluid, in this condition.

REFERENCES

  1. Gass JD. Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. Aug 1968;80(2):177-185.
  2. Abu-Yaghi NE, Hartono SP, Hodge DO, Pulido JS, Bakri SJ. White dot syndromes: a 20-year study of incidence, clinical features, and outcomes. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. Dec 2011;19(6):426-430.
  3. Raven ML, Ringeisen AL, Yonekawa Y, Stem MS, Faia LJ, Gottlieb JL. Multi-modal imaging and anatomic classification of the white dot syndromes. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2017;3:12.
  4. Ma DJ. Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy. In: Yu HG, ed. Inflammatory and Infectious Ocular Disorders. Singapore: Springer; 2020:1-7.
  5. Oliveira MA, Simão J, Martins A, Farinha C. Management of Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy (APMPPE): Insights from Multimodal Imaging with OCTA. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med.
  6. Van Buskirk EM, Lessell S, Friedman E. Pigmentary Epitheliopathy and Erythema Nodosum. Arch Ophthalmol. 1971;85(3):369-372. doi:10.1001/archopht.1971.00990050371025
  7. Deutman A, Oosterhuis J, Boen-Tan T, Aan de Kerk A. Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy - Pigment epitheliopathy or choriocapillaritis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1972;56(12):863-874. doi:10.1136/bjo.56.12.863
  8. Steptoe PJ, Pearce I, Beare NAV, et al. Proposing a Neurotropic Etiology for Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy and Relentless Placoid Chorioretinitis. Front Ophthalmol 2022;1:802962.
  9. Holt WS, Regan CD, Trempe C. Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. Apr 1976;81(4):403-412.
  10. Comu S, Verstraeten T, Rinkoff JS, Busis NA. Neurological manifestations of acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Stroke. May 1996;27(5):996-1001.
  11. Hernández-Da Mota SE. [Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Case report]. Cir Cir. 2016 Mar-Apr 2016;84(2):135-139.
  12. Kraemer LS, Montgomery JR, Baker KM, Colyer MH. ACUTE POSTERIOR MULTIFOCAL PLACOID PIGMENT EPITHELIOPATHY AFTER IMMUNIZATION WITH MULTIPLE VACCINES. Retin Cases Brief Rep. Jan 2020.
  13. Wolf MD, Folk JC, Panknen CA, Goeken NE. HLA-B7 and HLA-DR2 antigens and acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. May 1990;108(5):698-700.
  14. Browne A, Ansari W, Hu M, et al. Quantitative Analysis of Ellipsoid Zone in Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy. Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases. 2020;4(3):192-201.
  15. Scheufele TA, Witkin AJ, Schocket LS, et al. Photoreceptor atrophy in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy demonstrated by optical coherence tomography. Retina. Dec 2005;25(8):1109-1112.
  16. Desai R, Nesper P, Goldstein DA, Fawzi AA, Jampol LM, Gill M. OCT Angiography Imaging in Serpiginous Choroidopathy. Ophthalmol Retina. 04 2018;2(4):351-359.
  17. Pagliarini S, Piguet B, Ffytche TJ, Bird AC. Foveal involvement and lack of visual recovery in APMPPE associated with uncommon features. Eye (Lond). 1995;9 ( Pt 1):42-47.
  18. Maamari RN, Stunkel L, Kung NH, et al. Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy Complicated by Fatal Cerebral Vasculitis. J Neuroophthalmol. Jun 2019;39(2):260-267.
  19. Tsuboyama M, Chandler JV, Scharf E, et al. Neurologic Complications of Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy: A Case Series of 4 Patients. Neurohospitalist. Jul 2018;8(3):146-151.
  20. Birnbaum AD, et al. Subretinal fluid in acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy. Retina. 2010. May; 30(5): 810–814. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181c596f8
  21. Asano S, Tanaka R, Kawashima H, Kaburaki T. Relentless Placoid Chorioretinitis: A Case Series of Successful Tapering of Systemic Immunosuppressants Achieved with Adalimumab. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan-Apr 2019;10(1):145-152.
  22. Jyotirmay B, Jafferji SS, Sudharshan S, Kalpana B. Clinical profile, treatment, and visual outcome of ampiginous choroiditis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. Jan 2010;18(1):46-51.
TOP