Audit on incidences of Bevacizumab induced Hypertension as a Clinical Biomarker of Antitumor activity in day care Oncology at a Tertiary care hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Dr Arifa Aziz1, Dr Adeeba Zaki2, Dr Kiran fraz3, Afsheen Feroz4

1Staff Medical Officer, Supervisor at Day Care Oncology, Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
2Senior Instructor,Medical Oncologist, Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
3Medical Officer, Day Care Oncology, Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
4Head Nurse, Day Care Oncology Department of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

*Corresponding author

*Dr Arifa Aziz, Staff Medical Officer, Supervisor at Day Care Oncology, Department of Oncology, Aga Khan
University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

Abstracts

Background: Hypertension is one of the side effects of bevacizumab. This is an observational study to check the frequency of high blood pressure with bevacizumab infusion. Bevacizumab is humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin approved in metastatic colorectal cancer, advanced non squamous non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, recurrent glioblastoma, advanced cervical cancer, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, and metastatic breast cancer. Bevacizumab is administered intravenously in the range of 5–15 mg/kg at every 2 or 3 weeks.

Methods: Proforma was developed and blood pressure was measured before and after bevacizumab infusion in hospital by registered nurse, bevacizumab infusion was given at dose of 5 mg,7.5 mg,10 mg and 15 mg with or without chemotherapy were included. Data was collected from June 2022 till August 2022.

Inclusion Criteria: All patients coming in day care oncology both peads and adult population included in our study for administration of bevacizumab infusion.

Exclusion Criteria: Known case of hypertension.

Result: Number of patients data recorded was fifty seven out of these twelve patients developed Grade-1 hypertension, systolic blood pressure ranges between 140–159 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure ranges from 90-99 mmHg according to European Society of Hypertension guidelines. Hypertension in these patients developed during second and third cycles of bevacizumab infusion which is seen only in adult population.

Conclusion: Bevacizumab induced hypertension is not very frequent in our study usually developed in second and third cycle of bevacizumab infusion and was grade 1 hypertension according to European Society of Hypertension guidelines.

Key words: Bevacizumab, grade 1 hypertension, VEGF, Pharmacogenetics.

Introduction

Bevacizumab is an angiogenesis inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, advanced non squamous non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, recurrent glio-blastoma, advanced cervical cancer, and platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. It is also approved for treatment of metastatic breast cancer(1).. Bevacizumab is typically administered intravenously in the dose range of 5–15 mg/kg every 2 or 3 weeks. (2) The addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy regimens in the approved indications has been shown to significantly increase overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rate. (3)

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibody that binds to all isoforms and bioactive proteolytic fragments of human vascular endothelial growth factor A, which is essential for both normal and tumor angiogenesis.(4) By neutralizing VEGF, bevacizumab prevents the activation of VEGF tyrosine kinase receptors VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 on endothelial cells.

The anti-tumor effect of bevacizumab is primarily attributed to the inhibition of VEGFR2, slowing the growth of new blood vessels and effectively cutting off a tumour’s supply of oxygen and nutrients. Inhibition of VEGF signaling also improves delivery of cytotoxic drugs by lowering tumor interstitial fluid pressure and by reducing the number of non-functional tumor blood vessels. (5-6) The most serious adverse effects of bevacizumab are gastrointestinal perforations, surgery and wound healing complications and hemorrhage common major adverse drug reactions include thromboembolism, proteinuria, and is generally asymptomatic, less incidences of mild hypertension recorded but hypertension not properly and timely managed can lead to cardiovascular complications, hypertensive crisis with encephalopathy is very rare. (7-8)

After data analysis of our observational study of single centre at our Day Care Chemotherapy unit it was observed that in twelve patients out of total of fifty-seven patients developed grade 1 hypertension as shown in figure -1.

We review the clinical presentation of bevacizumab induced development of   hypertension has also been associated with cumulative dose of bevacizumab, (9) the highest risk of bevacizumab induced hypertension being reported in patients with renal cell carcinoma and breast cancer. (10)

All patients on bevacizumab treatment are recommended to have blood pressure monitoring every 2 to 3 weeks. Patients who develop significant rise in hypertension from baseline are advised to start anti-hypertensive therapy. Early initiation of antihypertensive therapy has been shown to reduce complications, even in life-threatening cases of encephalopathy species-mediated apoptosis of endothelial cells.

Method

Proforma was developed as shown in table- 1. Blood pressure was measured before and after bevacizumab infusion in hospital by registered nurse, bevacizumab infusion was given at dose of 5 mg,7.5 mg,10 mg and 15 mg with or without chemotherapy was included. European Society of Hypertension guidelines (ESH)  and classification of blood pressure criteria as shown in table-2 applied for comparison . Data was collected from June 2022 till August 2022 at day care oncology unit. Guidelines

Inclusion Criteria:

All patients coming in day care oncology included in our study, both peads and adult population has been included for administration of bevacizumab infusion.

Exclusion Criteria

Known case of hypertension.

fig 1 12

Figure 1:

Table 1: Audit Incidence of Bevacizumab induced Hypertension as a clinical biomarker of antitumor activity

table 1 5

Table 2: European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Classification of blood pressure and definitions of hypertension grade

table 2 4

Table 3

table 3 3
fig 2 8

Figure 2

Discussion

Hypertension is not frequently observed during treatment with bevacizumab in our study. Hypertension of all grades has been observed in up to 36% of patients seen in western population treated with bevacizumab (11). Low levels of nitric oxide are present in the vessels to maintain a balance between vasodilation and vasoconstriction. The synthesis and release of nitric oxide by the endothelial cells of the vasculature are modulated in part by VEGF-A and fibroblast growth factor.(12) if we compare our study with international studies incidence of hypertension is not frequent in our population only twelve patients out of fifty-seven patients developed grade I hypertension. Hypertension ranges of both systolic and diastolic in twelve patients recorded out of fifty-seven patients with grade 1 hypertension who received bevacizumab as shown in table- 2

Grade 1 hypertension was frequently followed by blood pressure elevations, suggesting that detecting grade 1 hypertension could allow identification of patients requiring further antihypertensive therapy. This single‐centre, observational prospective study was designed to compare various methods, readings of measurement and grading in patients receiving bevacizumab‐based chemotherapy. However, home‐based blood pressure monitoring twice‐daily and this self‐measurement of blood pressure check at home identified and seen that more patients developing hypertension at home than in‐clinic measurements. This difference was significant for all‐grade hypertension, but did not translate for grade ≥2 hypertension, suggesting that home‐based blood pressure monitoring is useful to detect grade 1 European Society of Hypertension guidelines (ESH), hypertension suggesting that detecting grade 1 hypertension could allow identification of patients requiring further antihypertensive therapy.

In another observational study done in western population, the incidence of hypertension occurring at any time during the treatment period was examined in the 39 patients who received >12 cycles of bevacizumab. Twenty‐eight patients (71.8%; 99% CI, 53.2%–90.4%) developed grade ≥1 hypertension during the treatment period, suggesting that prolonged exposure to bevacizumab might increase the risk for developing hypertension. (13)

Taken together, these findings from the prospective part of the study suggest that home‐based daily blood pressure assessment was the more reliable method to detect bevacizumab‐induced hypertension, whereas grading according to the European Society of Hypertension guidelines (ESH) criteria was more sensitive in detecting early BP elevation.

Furthermore, a high proportion of patients (71.8%) who received ≥12 cycles of bevacizumab developed hypertension; a finding consistent with the knowledge that the risk for developing bevacizumab associated hypertension appears constant over time (14). The cumulative dose received was strongly correlated with the occurrence of hypertension, whereas a history of hypertension was not present. This lack of association could be explained using antihypertensive agents in these patients.

Furthermore, the potential correlation between antitumor activity and the development of hypertension during bevacizumab treatment was examined. In contrast with previous reports no correlation between the development of hypertension occurring at any time during bevacizumab therapy and the response rate was seen. (15)This analysis indicated statistically higher response rates in patients who developed very early ≤42 days of treatment hypertension grade ≥1 according to the European Society of Hypertension guidelines (ESH) criteria. (16) In colorectal and pancreatic cancer patients receiving bevacizumab‐based chemotherapy although these observations examined hypertension occurring within 56 days of treatment. (17)

Conclusion

Bevacizumab induced hypertension is usually developed in second and third cycle of chemotherapy observed only in adult patients and was grade 1 hypertension according to European Society of hypertension guidelines (ESH). Data analysis shows that in paediatric patient’s high blood pressure is not seen with injection bevacizumab.

REFERENCES

  1. Zhang LL, Jiang WM, Yang HL, Luo ZP. Treatment of Ribbing disease with 5-year follow-up and literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1499-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3896-9. Epub 2017 Jan 18. PMID: 28101629.
  2.  Seeger LL, Hewel KC, Yao L, Gold RH, Mirra JM, Chandnani VP, Eckardt JJ. Ribbing disease (multiple diaphyseal sclerosis): imaging and differential diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Sep;167(3):689-94. doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.3.8751682. PMID: 8751682.
  3. Bonafe L, Cormier-Daire V, Hall C, Lachman R, Mortier G, Mundlos S, Nishimura G, Sangiorgi L, Savarirayan R, Sillence D, Spranger J, Superti-Furga A, Warman M, Unger S. Nosology and classification of genetic skeletal disorders: 2015 revision. Am J Med Genet A. 2015 Dec;167A(12):2869-92. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.37365. Epub 2015 Sep 23. PMID: 26394607.
  4. Gaeta M, Vinci S, Costa C, Oliviero R, Mazziotti S. MRI in Ribbing disease-a case report. Acta Orthop. 2009 Oct;80(5):622-4. doi: 10.3109/17453670903316876. PMID: 19916700; PMCID: PMC2823326.
  5. Ribbing disease: a systematic review, Bart G Pijls, Koen Steentjes, Jan W Schoones, Sander Pd Dijkstra, 2018, Acta Radiol ;59(4):448-453. PMID: 28691528 , DOI: 10.1177/0284185117719575
  6. Pijls BG, Steentjes K, Schoones JW, Dijkstra SP. Ribbing disease: a systematic review. Acta Radiol. 2018 Apr;59(4):448-453. doi: 10.1177/0284185117719575. Epub 2017 Jul 10. PMID: 28691528.
  7. Sakai T, Matsui Y, Katoh S, Yukata K, Hamada D, Takata Y, Yokoi H, Yasui N. Asynchronous progressive diaphyseal dysplasia. Mod Rheumatol. 2005;15(6):450-3. doi: 10.1007/s10165-005-0440-8. PMID: 17029112.
  8. Di Carlo M, Silveri F, Tardella M, Carotti M, Salaffi F. Multiple diaphyseal sclerosis (Ribbing disease): what about neridronate? Osteoporos Int. 2016 Oct;27(10):3127-31. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3604-9. Epub 2016 Apr 22. PMID: 27105644.
  9. Savoie A, Gouin F, Maugars Y, Isidor B, Larrose C, Berthelot JM. Treatment responses in five patients with Ribbing disease including two with 466C>T missense mutations in TGFβ1. Joint Bone Spine. 2013 Dec;80(6):638-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Mar 1. PMID: 23453470.
  10. Trombetti A, Cortes F, Kaelin A, Morris M, Rizzoli R. Intranasal calcitonin reducing bone pain in a patient with Camurati-Engelmann disease. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012 Feb;41(1):75-7. doi: 10.3109/03009742.2011.608195. Epub 2011 Nov 1. PMID: 22044122.
  11. Abdulla MC. Camurati-Engelmann Disease with Good Treatment Response to Losartan. Indian J Nucl Med. 2019 Jul-Sep;34(3):223-225. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_44_19. PMID: 31293304; PMCID: PMC6593949.
  12. Noain-Sanz E, Martínez de Morentin-Garraza J, Eslava-Gurrea E. Fresado endomedular en la enfermedad de Ribbing [Intramedullary reaming in Ribbing disease]. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2013 May-Jun;57(3):231-4. Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Apr 11. PMID: 23746922.
TOP